The platforms of low-code/no-code make a lot of speed and accessibility advantages. They allow developing an application with visual tools and prepackaged components, which hugely saves time on classic development. This speeds the mode of response to business requirements and digital transformation plans and reduces barriers to technical engagements.
These channels would provide high levels of cost effectiveness because they do not rely on professional software developers who may be costly. They enable business users to develop solutions to address targeted needs directly which leads to innovation and discovery of different improvements to processes which may prove difficult using common coding.
Nevertheless, there are serious disadvantages. LCNC applications are usually restricted when they need to deal with complex business logic, complex integrations or complex business transactions. Withdrawing platforms to capabilities not innate to them threatens to create technical debt with delicate or ineffectual solutions that fail to enable scalability.
There are very important risks relating to vendor lock-in and security issues. The use of a proprietary environment of a particular platform means that migration is very challenging and expensive. The question of security also depends greatly on the practices of the vendor, which might introduce areas of vulnerability and difficulties in compliance, when the platform is not under direct control.
Strategic deployment is needed to succeed. LCNC is good in basic workflows, prototypes, and departmental applications. Traditional core systems require complex core development. To take advantage of these benefits with minimal risks of lock-in and functional limitations, it is important to effectively govern the use of platforms, define its scope and familiarize yourself with its limitations.
Conclusion:
Low-code/no-code platforms are fast to build, require less funding to save on costs, and the limitation found in a low-code / no-code platform is the complexity, scalability, and customization. The most serious risks are vendor lock-in and security dependency risks. Proper applications require strategic use as well as good governance to ensure that the benefits of such are maximized whilst these aspects of drawback are minimized.
