Was Chanakya in support or critic of democracy?

Asked 21-Sep-2022
Viewed 145 times

1 Answer


Chanakya was an Indian political philosopher and royal advisor who lived in the 4th century BCE. He is widely considered to be one of the most influential figures in Indian history. Chanakya is known for his treatise, the Arthashastra, which contains detailed advice on politics, diplomacy, and war.

Chanakya was a strong advocate of monarchy and believed that it was the best form of government. Chanakya believed that a strong ruler was necessary to maintain order and stability in a society. He believed that democracy would lead to chaos and anarchy. Chanakya was also critical of the caste system and believed that it was unfair and unjust.

Was Chanakya in support or critic of democracy?

Chanakya's views on democracy are complex. Chanakya argues that democracy is inherently unstable, because it gives too much power to the people. This, he says, leads to chaos and anarchy. He also argues that democracy leads to corruption, because elected officials are more likely to be swayed by bribery and special interests. Chanakya's criticisms of democracy are not without merit. democracies are often more chaotic and less effective than monarchies. However, it is worth noting that Chanakya lived in a time when democracy was a very new form of government, and it was not yet clear how well it would work in practice. In the centuries since Chanakya's time, democracies have become more stable and effective, and corruption has been reduced. Overall, Chanakya's views on democracy are complex. He was clearly not a fan of democracy, but he also recognized that it had the potential to be a great form of government. Ultimately, Chanakya's views on democracy were shaped by his experiences and the context of his time.