Olympic Games!

All the Countries are capable and eligible for bidding, to organize the Olympic Games at any point of time, similarly, it is not necessary that New Delhi bid for the same.  

The process of bidding hereby goes with the designed, which allows the bidding been delivered from a particular city but not by countries… Every National Olympic Committee of each country is been invited to bid for the city where they want to organize the Olympic, then the weight is given to the best bid that is been made which is been forwarded to the International Olympic Committee, whose decision is been the final call.

Considering the following reason which might be justifying, why India should not bid for the same:

1. Olympics have a past filled with making misfortune their host urban areas, notwithstanding when all exchanges are honest to goodness and there is no debasement. The London Olympics cost around 10-15 billion USD when London did not need to build the greater part of the framework for the Games. On the off chance that New Delhi chose to have the Olympics and regardless of whether it utilizes the current framework, our avaricious directors will raise the expenses to such levels that it will take a long time for our nation to earn back the original investment. The Commonwealth Games themselves are less expensive to lead when contrasted with the Olympics yet we made it the costliest Games ever. We are certain to soften the record up to an instance of the Olympic Games by a tremendous edge.

2. The Olympic Games is about games, other than cricket. Indians are not that great in sports, other than cricket. In this way, it would appear to be unexpected that a nation which can't create fine, decoration winning games people are offering for the Olympics. On the off chance that we have the Olympics, it would be lost face for every one of us and we may turn into the question of derision. Unless India is fit for delivering competitors who can reliably perform well at the Olympics, it is worthless to consider facilitating it. In the meantime, there will be an absence of open help for our members, on the grounds that there would be very few individuals whom we could bolster.

Though they make a foot ahead for the bidding for the Olympics, the question now arose is whether the IOC would accept the bid or not. Following are the reason which would justify this: 

1. The City who would be in-charge for the host of the event should prove themselves, whether or not they are capable of handling the gigantic populace who are intended to attend the event and are capable enough for facilitating the means for the public transit. If I talk about New Delhi then it is anyways overcrowded. Now, this is meant to just state that the crowd that was present during the Common Wealth Game was just the small picture of the Olympic Games. Though the city can get the success in accommodating all the athletes it would not be capable of handling the huge flow of the tourist onto the floor.

As you might be aware of the traffic case that the city is facing which would ultimately result in the non-enjoyment of the Game by the locale as well.

2. The quotation by the IOC was such that the locale of the city should themselves feel comfortable for organizing the event. Ultimately the resources are been used is of their city thus, stating that people of the city would not be ready for the going through the burden post the Common Wealth Games’ debacle.  

Thus, it isn't handy for New Delhi to offer for the Olympics in the event that you break down the present circumstance. Be that as it may, I am not proposing that India can never have the Olympics. Potentially later on when India turns into a donning superpower and when some other city, not New Delhi, offers for the Games, we may see the Olympics coming here. 

All The Best!