SC wants what in EVMs for fair elections now?

Asked 29-Dec-2017
Updated 14-Sep-2023
Viewed 641 times

1 Answer


0

The term "SC" can refer to multiple entities, but I assume you are referring to the Supreme Court of India. If there have been any recent developments or specific directives from the Supreme Court regarding Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and fair elections since that time, I do not have access to that information. However, I can provide a general understanding of what courts and authorities often seek to ensure fair elections using EVMs.

In democracies like India, ensuring fair and transparent elections is a top priority. Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) have been integral to the election process, offering several advantages such as speed, accuracy, and reduced fraud potential. To ensure fair elections using EVMs, courts and election authorities often focus on the following aspects:

1. Security and Tamper Resistance: Courts and authorities emphasize the need for robust security measures to prevent tampering or manipulation of EVMs. This includes physical security during transportation and storage and encryption of data.

2. Voter Verifiability: Ensuring that voters can verify their choices is crucial. Some systems incorporate Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs), which allow voters to verify their selections on a paper printout before it is stored securely as a record.

3. Transparency: Transparency in the election process is a fundamental requirement. Courts often demand transparency in the functioning of EVMs, including how they are manufactured, tested, transported, and stored.

4. Randomization: The randomization of EVMs is essential to prevent any patterns that could be exploited. Courts may require that EVMs be allocated to constituencies randomly to ensure fairness.

5. Independent Audits: Regular independent audits and testing of EVMs are crucial to detect any anomalies or malfunctions. These audits can help maintain the integrity of the election process.

6. Accessibility: Ensuring that EVMs are accessible to all voters, including those with disabilities, is essential for inclusivity in elections.

7. Legal Framework: Courts often seek to ensure that there is a strong legal framework in place to govern the use of EVMs, outlining procedures for their use, maintenance, and auditing.

8. Education and Training: Providing adequate education and training to election officials and voters on the proper use of EVMs is vital to minimize errors and ensure a smooth voting process.

It's important to note that the specific requirements and directives related to EVMs may vary from one jurisdiction to another, and they may evolve over time in response to technological advancements and emerging challenges. To obtain the most current information on any recent Supreme Court directives or developments related to EVMs and fair elections in India, I recommend referring to official government sources and reputable news outlets.