Despite that "living will" seems to be a corollary to passive euthanasia, why there is opposition to living will?

Asked 13-Dec-2017
Updated 09-Sep-2023
Viewed 716 times


Despite that "living will" seems to be a corollary to passive euthanasia, why there is opposition to living will? 

    1 Answer


    Opposition to living wills, also known as advance directives or healthcare directives, arises from a variety of ethical, cultural, legal, and practical concerns. While living wills are intended to allow individuals to make decisions about their medical care when they are unable to do so, the following factors contribute to the opposition:

    1. Ethical and Moral Beliefs: Some individuals and cultures have strong ethical or religious beliefs that oppose any form of euthanasia or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, even in cases where the patient is in a terminal or irreversible condition. They may view living wills as facilitating actions that go against these beliefs.

    2. Concerns About Misuse: Critics worry that living wills may be misinterpreted or misused to prematurely withdraw life-sustaining treatment, potentially leading to the loss of life when there might still be hope for recovery or improvement.

    3. Medical Uncertainty: Healthcare decisions are often complex and depend on a variety of factors, including the patient's condition, prognosis, and available treatment options. Critics argue that living wills may oversimplify these decisions and fail to account for changing medical circumstances.

    4. Family and Physician Disagreements: Disagreements among family members and healthcare providers can arise when interpreting or implementing living wills. This can lead to legal and ethical dilemmas, as well as emotional distress for all involved parties.

    5. Lack of Clarity: Some living wills may not provide clear and specific guidance on the types of treatments a person wishes to receive or avoid. This lack of clarity can lead to confusion and disputes.

    6. Fear of Coercion: There are concerns that individuals may feel pressured to create a living will or make specific healthcare decisions against their true wishes, especially in situations where family dynamics or financial considerations come into play.

    7. Legal and Liability Issues: Healthcare providers may fear legal repercussions if they follow a living will's directives that may later be questioned or challenged by family members or others. This fear of liability can deter medical professionals from respecting living wills.

    8. Cultural Variations: Cultural perspectives on end-of-life care can vary widely, and living wills may not align with the preferences and beliefs of all individuals or communities.

    It's important to note that despite these concerns and opposition, living wills serve an essential purpose in providing individuals with a means to express their healthcare preferences and maintain autonomy in medical decision-making. Many countries have legal frameworks in place to regulate living wills and ensure they are used appropriately, addressing some of the concerns raised by opponents. Ultimately, the use and acceptance of living wills may continue to evolve as society grapples with the complexities of end-of-life care and individual autonomy.