0
In Indian polity, the choice of a parliamentary system is often discussed alongside the country’s colonial experience and the need for an accountable government. But which considerations carried the most weight for the Constituent Assembly?
Was the decision mainly influenced by familiarity with parliamentary institutions, the relationship between the executive and legislature, or the need to represent a diverse new republic? I’m looking for a clear explanation of the debate and the constitutional features that reflected the Assembly’s choice, rather than just a list of textbook points.
