0
I’ve noticed that close cricket decisions can look quite different from one match to another, even when DRS is available. Some reviews seem to turn on a tiny margin, while in other cases the on-field decision appears to carry more weight than I expected.
Which parts of the system most affect that impression—ball-tracking margins, the “umpire’s call” rule, camera angles, or how commentators explain the evidence? I’m curious whether fans see this as a rules issue or mainly a communication problem.
