0
Could a military strike on a nuclear facility ever comply with international law, or would the risks to civilians and the environment make it unlawful?
The answer seems more complicated than whether a site has military significance. I’d like to understand how legal analysis weighs the purpose of an attack, the expected civilian harm, the risk of radiation release, and whether the facility is protected by specific treaty obligations.
How do legal experts assess these questions when the facts are disputed and decisions are being made during an active crisis?
