Dynamic typing and static typing refer to the manner in which a program addresses the declaration of variable types. Variable types are decided when the program is being run instead of at the time of writing the code like in static typed languages which include C++ and Java. This brings the added advantage of making programming easier since developers do not need to define the type of data they are using. But, it may cause runtime errors if the variable is used in a wrong manner and the task of debugging the code becomes tiresome.

On the other hand, there are the so called statically typed languages, or principle examples of which are Java or C ++, where the variable database types should be defined during the compilation process. It involves checking the type of a data before it is executed and thus prevents many type related problems at runtime. Although this approach could somewhat slow the developmental progress for the same reason that type declarations need to be imposed, it would generally produce more stable and predictable code, especially for purposes of large-scale applications.

Another notable difference is in the aspect of performance. Static programming languages, in most cases, perform better because the compiler has the ability to compile in reference to types. Still, dynamically typed languages may require extra operation at runtime, such as type checks and interpretation, which reduces the speed limit of an application effective in performance-based use.

The decision between the two dancing styles mostly depends on what is required in the given project. Another reason why dynamically typed languages are preferred is due to its opposite adoption when designing prototypes, use of scripting languages and relatively small-scale undertaking where time is of the essence. On the other hand, there is the statically typed language that is most appropriate for large solutions since type-safety is a huge advantage for such solutions together with maintainability and the possibility of achieving high efficiency.

Recognition of these distinctions enables the developers to select the most appropriate tool from aspects of speed, safety, and performance. All of the approaches have their advantages as well as their disadvantages and will depend on the aim and type of assessment undertaken.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there are a number of advantages of the dynamically typed language; less time is spent on writing and more time on the thought process since the variable types are determined during the run time of the program; therefore more suitable for prototyping projects and projects with a less number of lines. On the other hand, statically typed languages follow the declaration of type at the development process prior to run time and that makes it more reliable and maintainable, optimum in the case of the large scale applications. It is for this reason that the two types have their strengths and weaknesses in the function they perform on projects: dynamic typing is faster than static typing whereas the latter is safer and efficient. Understanding these differences assists the developers in making the right choice when choosing the most appropriate approach.