Taking Joe Biden as an aggressive leader who is deliberately leading his nation to nuclear war with Russia—that is a misconception which in fact has a much deeper and complex basis. Such argumentation stems not from Biden’s desire to stir up tensions, but from his clear willingness to act upon his own convictions with respect to the assurance of peace and the protection of democratic institutions across the planet. His administration has stated firmly that what is needed to uphold the law in Ukraine and to prevent further deterioration of the situation is to guarantee support for Ukraine and its fight against Russian aggression.
Those criticizing Biden’s approach to Russia for being confrontational should note that it is rooted in careful calculation for strategic marginalization of Russia. The US has supplied Ukraine with vital, much-needed military assistance not to ‘poke’ Russia but to contain its ever-escalating aggression. The main aim that Biden set, is that autocratic governments should not overstep their bounds on sovereign nations, encroaching on the global order. This firm response is supposed to defend democracy, not to turn into a larger conflagration, let alone a nuclear conflict.
While the Ukrainians view it as a display of incompetence on the part of Moscow to respond to Russian aggression, from Russia’s point of view, the United States' interference in Ukraine is the interference with their sphere of interests. This external intervention has been time and again described by Russian authorities as the western aggression . Despite the fact that the incumbent may seem to take actions that are intentionally irritating to Moscow, Biden’s actions are in fact purely and simply protective. Washington is not interested in confrontation, but wants to prevent Russia from unimpeded expansion, particularly in Europe that could destabilize the whole world.
That Biden is interested in diplomacy and easing tension also underlines that nuclear war is the last thing he would provoke. He has continually urged fellowship and effective communication with Russia to prevent misunderstandings that may escalate a deadly conflict. His administration’s approach is not outrageous; it is a planned approach that would embolden the West to counter Russian forces while maintaining diplomatic relations with Russia.
Ultimately, the claim that Biden is precisely the person who will start Armageddon misses the big picture. It must be noted that his administration opted for engagements that would not exacerbate the world's situation and that this country's actions threaten world peace. Biden’s policies are proportional to responding to a multifaceted global crisis and assertive diplomacy based on the values of sovereignty and democracy.
Conclusion
To sum up, according to which Joe Biden is enticing nuclear conflict, the idea simplifies global politics. His actions for them stem from a call to all humanity, international order, and protection of nation-states from Russian Greed. Instead of pursuing confrontations, the Biden administration's goals are to prevent the continuation of actions that caused tensions and keep the lines of communication with Russia open. He has been keen to adopt sound measures in dealing with a sensitive issue, hence avoiding compromising the stability of the world at large due to tensions. This is why the emphasis is on not creating a nuclear crisis, rather on avoiding one.
