---
title: "For UPSC, How Does an Alternative Remedy Affect a Writ Petition Under Article 226?"  
description: "For UPSC, How Does an Alternative Remedy Affect a Writ Petition Under Article 226?"  
author: "Sigurður Sigurðsson"  
published: 2026-10-19  
canonical: https://answers.mindstick.com/qa/117888/for-upsc-how-does-an-alternative-remedy-affect-a-writ-petition-under-article-226  
category: "Mix Category"  
tags: ["UPSC", "Indian Polity", "Constitutional Law"]  
reading_time: 1 minute  

---

# For UPSC, How Does an Alternative Remedy Affect a Writ Petition Under Article 226?

While revising writ jurisdiction for UPSC, I keep seeing the statement that a High Court will ordinarily not entertain a writ petition when an effective alternative remedy is available.

Suppose a person challenges an administrative order, but the relevant statute already provides an appeal. Does that appeal remove the High Court’s jurisdiction, or is declining the petition a matter of judicial discretion?

## The distinction I’m trying to understand

- Is the availability of an appeal enough, or does the effectiveness of that remedy matter?
- How would an alleged breach of natural justice or an order passed without jurisdiction affect the analysis?
- How should I distinguish this rule under Article 226 from access to the Supreme Court under Article 32?

I’m looking for a clear explanation of the **alternative remedy rule** that would help with both a prelims statement and a short mains answer, without treating every alleged illegality as an automatic exception.


---

Original Source: https://answers.mindstick.com/qa/117888/for-upsc-how-does-an-alternative-remedy-affect-a-writ-petition-under-article-226

Copyright © MindStick Software Pvt. Ltd. This Markdown version is provided for developers, AI systems, and offline reading.