Article 50 of the Constitution of India is an ordering guideline of the state approach. It provides guidance to the State to keep Judiciary autonomous of the Executive, especially in legal arrangements. Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive is enjoined under Article 51 only.
There are 3 key parameters here-
Judiciary
Executive
Public Services
These 3 parameters shout for all to hear the setting in which the Article has been composed. Official in this setting are the changeless administrators (Eg: Bureaucrats) and not the impermanent administrators (Ministers).
Transitory administrators collaborate with individuals. In such limit, they may deliberately or accidentally imperil the privileges of individuals. Distressed individuals may look for legal assistance to get equity. This is conceivable on the grounds that there is a partition between the legal executive and the official.
What reason does the Article 50 serve?
The Article sets up the teaching of Natural Justice
Tenet of Natural Justice says-
Option to be heard.
Authority should work without inclination.
No man can be the adjudicator in his own case.
State, for instance, The Police(Executive) gets you for wrongdoing you didn't submit.
You're put behind the bars for a night. The next day, you're gotten the preliminary court. You find that the auditor who captured you is presently sitting on the seat of Magistrate(Judiciary). Will you get equity?
No. This is the thing that would occur if such a partition isn't provisioned. On the off chance that forces are not isolated, almost certainly, the organ would get authoritarian and along these lines, the state would never again be a government assistance state. Article 50 is incompatible with the possibility of division of forces alongside the standards of normal equity. Thus, the governing body is rejected from the Article .