The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has been hesitant to fully embrace the Decision Review System (DRS) for several reasons. One of the foremost concerns raised by the BCCI is the perceived inaccuracy and unreliability of certain components of the DRS technology, particularly the ball-tracking system known as Hawk-Eye. There have been reservations about the system's precision in determining the trajectory and impact of the ball, particularly in close LBW (Leg Before Wicket) decisions, which can be game-changing moments. The BCCI argues that errors in the technology can potentially lead to incorrect decisions and impact the outcome of matches.

Another significant concern for the BCCI is the need for uniformity in the application of DRS technology across all international matches and series. Inconsistencies in the availability and use of the system have been a point of contention, with some series having access to the technology while others do not. This lack of uniformity has raised doubts about the fairness and consistency of decision-making in international cricket.

Cost considerations also play a role in the BCCI's hesitancy. Implementing DRS technology can be expensive, and the financial implications of adopting the system for all matches, especially at the domestic level, are a valid concern. Furthermore, ensuring that the technology is functional and accessible at various cricket venues across India, which vary widely in terms of infrastructure, poses logistical challenges.

Preserving the authority and judgment of on-field umpires is another key aspect of the BCCI's stance. Some within the organization emphasize the importance of upholding the umpire's role in making decisions and argue that excessive reliance on technology might diminish their authority.

Trust and transparency are critical factors. The BCCI seeks greater clarity and openness regarding the functioning of DRS technologies, including the algorithms used by Hawk-Eye. Past controversies and disputes surrounding the DRS have contributed to the cautious approach, as trust in the accuracy and fairness of the system remains a paramount concern for the BCCI. In summary, the BCCI's hesitation to fully adopt the DRS is rooted in concerns about accuracy, uniformity, cost, the role of on-field umpires, and the need for transparency in decision-making processes.